Finding a research problem, or a gap in the current body of knowledge on your subject is the first step in any investigation. After you have accomplished this, the next step is to construct a problem statement that encapsulates the problem at hand and describes how you intend to address it. Every scientific inquiry begins with a clear description of the issue at hand.
Since the problem of a statement in research is fundamental, it is important to understand what makes a good research design. What is the procedure then? You should start by learning the components of a problem statement. If you are going to carry out a methodical investigation, it is highly recommended that you read this article, as it will guide you on how to write its problem statement and how to structure a proposal.
Research Problem Statement: What Is It?
The term “problem statement” is used to describe the core issue that your study will attempt to answer. Simply said, it encapsulates the information void that you want your research to fill by producing credible findings or outcomes. The length of your issue statement is not as important as the fact that it clearly articulates the purpose of your research. Your work not only fills this need, but also encourages more research in this area. If you want your problem statement to be taken seriously, it shouldn’t cover too much ground. Instead, it should focus on a single issue and add to the body of existing research.
A Problem Statement: How Do You Write One?
Here are 6 steps to writing a research problem:
- Contextualise your research
- Explain the issue
- Cost breakdown
- Provide Evidence
- Summarise the problem and solution
Contextualise your research
In order to help your readers grasp the issue at hand, you must first provide a firm backdrop for them to do so. One workaround is to envision a universe free of the issue being discussed. In other words, show your readers how much better off they’d be if they’d never encountered this issue to begin with. If you’re investigating why there have been so many railway accidents in London, for instance, you might begin by outlining how things would run if the present issue didn’t exist. Following this, you may conclude your discussion by bringing up the research problem.
Explain the issue
It is important to explain to the audience why fixing this issue is critical at this time. To rephrase the question, please explain why it is crucial that we address this issue. Essentially, it wouldn’t matter. Here, you need to convince the reader that the research problem you’ve identified is the most pressing one. Additionally, you may want to describe previous efforts to resolve the issue and the reasons why they were unsuccessful.
Include any costs associated with ignoring the issue at this point. To better pitch for research funding, you should utilise this.
To prove that the issue is detrimental to others, you must provide solid evidence. To complete your study, you will now consult any applicable secondary data sources and incorporate their findings.
Since we have identified the issue at hand, the next logical question is, “How can we fix it?” To respond, you must provide an actionable approach to the research problem. Invest some time in explaining why this particular approach is the most reasonable one and, hence, will be successful. Most importantly, you should concentrate on the effect that your solution will have and point towards the advantages it will provide.
Summarise the problem and solution
Your conclusion should include a restatement of the issue, an explanation of why it needs fixing, and a brief defence of why your proposed solution is the most effective one.
Careless Errors in Problem Statements
If you want the remainder of your dissertation to succeed, you need to start with a solid issue statement. Here, therefore, are some considerations to keep in mind when you develop your research paper’s problem statement.
- Make sure your explanation of the issue is clear and concise. Every word should stress the significance of your research.
- You need to specify the issue more narrowly.
- Don’t get too bogged down in the details or use too much technical terminology.
- Convincing the reader requires you to construct an argument that follows logical premises.
- Place more emphasis on the problem’s “why.”